Skip to Content

Lane L. Vines

Senior Counsel
P: 215.875.4658
F: 215.875.4604
lvines@bm.net Download vCard

Lane L. Vines's practice is concentrated in the areas of securities/investor fraud, consumer and qui tam litigation.  For more than 17 years, Mr. Vines has prosecuted both class action and individual opt-out securities cases for state government entities, public pension funds, and other large investors. Mr. Vines also represents consumers in class actions involving unlawful and deceptive practices, as well as relators in qui tam, whistleblower and False Claims Act litigations.  Mr. Vines is admitted to practice law in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and numerous federal courts.

Mr. Vines also has experience in the defense of securities and commercial cases.  For example, he was one of the firm's principal attorneys defending a public company which obtained a pre-trial dismissal in full of a proposed securities fraud class action against a gold mining company based in South Africa.  See In re DRDGold Ltd. Securities Litigation, 05-cv-5542 (VM), 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7180 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2007).

During law school, Mr. Vines was a member of the Villanova Law Review and served as a Managing Editor of Outside Works.  In that role, he selected outside academic articles for publication and oversaw the editorial process through publication.

Prior to law school, Mr. Vines worked as an auditor for a Big 4 public accounting firm and a property controller for a commercial real estate development firm, and served as the Legislative Assistant to the Minority Leader of the Philadelphia City Council.

Mr. Vines has achieved the highest peer rating, "AV Preeminent" in Martindale-Hubbell for legal abilities and ethical standards. Mr. Vines is admitted to practice law in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and several federal courts.

Prominent Judgments & Settlements

  • Dodona I, LLC v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., No. 10-cv-7497, 296 F.R.D. 261 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) ($27.5 million class settlement involving collateralized debt obligations offerings)
  • Vasco v. Power Home Remodeling Group LLC, No. 15-cv-4623 (E.D. Pa.) ($5.2 million class recovery)
  • Pa. Pub. School Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Citigroup Inc., No. 05028, Jan. Term, 2011 (Pa. Common Pleas Ct.-Phila.) (confidential settlement)
  • In re NetBank, Inc. Secs. Litig., No. 07-cv-2298-TCB (N.D. Ga.) (class recovery of $12.5 million, where target company was in bankruptcy)
  • In re Bayou Hedge Funds Investment Litig., No. 06 MDL 1755 (CM) (S.D.N.Y.) (confidential settlements involving hedge fund fraud)
  • Breakaway Solutions, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., C.A. No. 19522-NC (Del. Ch.) (confidential settlement involving IPO)
  • Pa. Pub. School Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Time Warner Inc., No. 002103, July Term, 2003 (Pa. Common Pleas Ct.-Phila.) ($23 million settlement in securities opt-out action)
  • In re Aerosonic Corp. Secs. Litig., No. 03-cv-2373-T-24 SCB-TBM (M.D. Fla.) ($5.35 million class recovery, approximately 65% of claimed investor losses)
  • Kelly v. McKesson HBOC, Inc., C.A. No. 99C-09-265 WCC (Del. Super.) (confidential settlement in securities opt-out action)
  • In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Research Reports Secs. Litig. 02 MDL 1484 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y.) ($15 million recovery in securities class action involving analyst research)
  • In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Secs., Deriv. and ERISA Litig. No. 07-cv-9633 (S.D.N.Y.) ($475 million recovery in securities class action involving subprime exposures)
  • Sapir v. Delphi Ventures, No. 99-cv-8086-JORDAN (S.D. Fla.) ($3.8 million recovery, yielding net recovery of approximately 50% of claimed losses)
  • In re Waste Management, Inc. Secs. Litig., No. H-01-4381 (S.D. Tex.) (confidential settlement in securities opt-out action)
  • In re DRDGold Ltd. Secs. Litig., No. 05-cv-5542 (VM) (S.D.N.Y.) (successfully defended public gold mining company based in South Africa, obtaining early pre-trial dismissal in full of proposed securities fraud class action)