![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
|
|
|
Berger & Montague, P.C. Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against SRI Surgical Express, Inc. 12/19/01 Business Editors/Legal Writers PHILADELPHIA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 19, 2001--The law firm of Berger & Montague, P.C., (http://www.bm.net) filed a class action suit on behalf of an investor against SRI Surgical Express, Inc. ("SRI" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: STRC - news) and its principal officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Tampa) on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased SRI Surgical Express, Inc. securities during the period from July 23, 2001 through and including November 27, 2001, inclusive (the "Class Period"). The complaint charges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of l934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market between July 23, 2001 and November 27, 2001. Specifically, on July 23, 2001 SRI issued a press release announcing financial results for the second quarter of 2001, which reflected an increase in earnings and revenues from the second quarter of 2000. The press release attributed the seemingly positive results to processing and delivery efficiencies and a supposedly lucrative contract with Health Trust Purchasing Group ("HGP"). These results were incorporated into the Company's financial statements on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2001. On October 22, 2001, the Company issued a press release announcing record revenues for SRI's third quarter of 2001, which the Company attributed, in part, to the HGP contract. These statements are alleged to be materially false and misleading because SRI's business was being negatively impacted by the HGP contract and the Company's seemingly impressive growth was achieved in part, through improper If you purchased SRI Surgical Express, Inc. securities during the period from July 23, 2001 to November 27, 2001, inclusive, you may, no later than January 29, 2001, move to be appointed lead plaintiff. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member's claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as "lead plaintiff." Your ability to share in any recovery, is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. "Class counsel did a remarkable job in representing the class interests." In Re: IKON Offices Solutions Securities Litigation. "...(Y)ou have acted the way lawyers at their best ought to act. And I have had a lot of cases...in 15 years now as a judge and I cannot recall a significant case where I felt people were better represented than they are here ... I would say this has been the best representation that I have seen." In Re: Waste Management, Inc. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 97-C 7709 (N.D. Ill.) (settled in 1999 for $220 million). If you purchased SRI Surgical Express, Inc. securities during the Class Period, or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights with respect to this matter, please contact: Todd S. Collins, Esquire
|
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||